Hello, how are you, how are you all? Is not that OK? Well, this blog I do for a certain group of people do I think that atheists nescesitamos of God, which I think is totally irrational, is like saying that a man of 40 years, with well-paid job and wife and children need a dad who is taking care all the time, and over the imaginary father. Sorry if I offend the religious beliefs of some, but as my good friend the murderer, 2008, one thing to have beliefs and another to be a blind bigot, this video is caused by a mocking imitation of Christian that Pienza that their ignorance can obscure the whole powerful and supreme proprietor of the blog xD. Damn I love you all with infinite love and intermnable, but if you believe in me the fuck with toturas horrible for the rest of the motherhood xD, fuck that I'm still like that patan, haha \u200b\u200bwell, that is aimed at Cristianitos those jerks, eye Cristianitos, if you want my concept Cristianitos saver is the step by private message, that if you like, if not, it is peeled. Anyway, this goes for those who leave the major premise cristina, damn it seems that everyone is hata copipaste of themselves, "You are of those who come from mono Pienza," well, since that first comment, with the simple separate commentary apparent lack of imagination and argumentation that takes shape very implicit this prayer all chulenca denotes ignorance, let us say the main source of internet conosimiento about the word monkey. Here is an fracmento.
in this scientific jargon, the apes would comprise the Platyrrhini (New World monkeys), and Cercopithecoidea (Old World monkeys) but huminoides primates closest to man as the orangutan, gorilla, chimpanzee and gibbon, which would apes.
if he does not explain, but the monkey, just a kind of ape, but if we see the evolutionary table, we never encounter the word monkey, monkey apparently is a derogatory word to refer to apes. That is also the beginning of the wikipedia article. Therefore, the word monkey is not a term presisamente accepted by science to be a mere jargon, although in some cases of the English language are synonymous monkey and ape, this is not entirely accepted by the scientific community, haha as you see? Well, if you delve a bit, which clearly have not made the Cristianitos, we see that actually come from a primitive ape, a primate original, much like a titi tarsier or even that good, the tarsier is a species of titi night, then talk about natural selection brothers and sisters xD. Well, here is what appears in quotes, irrational these people, the process of evolution, is that they used to a vision of things jump creasionista with many things incoehrentes, Pienza them that if we ignore what the science says is like saying a titi derrepente of overnight gave birth to a baby huamano ... well, a monkey as they call them, fuck you monkey say monkey is like telling a black to a black or colored person. This is just consepcion sulla denying scientific evidence and cling to their faith creationist, forgetting that the process of evolution takes thousands of years, passed billions of years for that proto titi into something very like a lemur, like those of the film Madagascar, which incidentally species of titi and lemurs many. After the primitive lemur, which is the correct word to classify ancient species of animals, objects, etc. evolved in two different ways, resulted tailed arboreal apes, like squirrel monkey and capuchin , watch that the monkeys xD cool, in fact mono-speak in the scientific community is for this class catolog tailed primates or apes, although I repeat, is not an official term. You see that so-called monkeys are our ancestors, are just a branch parallel to the ... tararan, apes, there are two types of apes, simply apes, such as chuck, the monkey and the baboon and the so-called Great Apes, antropiode shaped, bone in human form, I mean that these great apes of all kinds of primate are the closest resemblance to humans, this range of higher primates are the gorilla, the orangutan and the chimpanzee, which are not only similar in size, but also, especially chimpanzees share more than 90% of our genes with them, being the chromosomal difference of only one chromosome, only humans have one more, and there seems to lie having so weak bodies and brains so powerful, even I can not say that all compiled like others, I say, whether or not a mind as they say over there about habladorcitos, illuminated or illustrated juaz truth, you can communicate via spoken, solve mathematical procedures, complex or medium complexity, can reason, deduce and many things that animals do not possess or have a very rudimentary or primitive, this foundation is not only in what I say, if it is also in the fossil record and in caves in Europe and America. Where you can go see the decrease of attributes in quotes "savages" and an increase in cranial capacity of the primate who managed to become a man , Sease said in passing that the famous missing link as such does not exist. That's right, and maybe there never existed as such, why? For that his quest began long before the fossil DNA procedures were feasible, I think no sap nor fart with DNA. Science seeks only the Slavonic now lost, if not already found it, remember to lucy to complete the collection of hominid fossils, the fossil record is the strongest prueva step of the evolution of man from a titi primaveal homo sapiens sapiens that we see today. Now on to another argument the c ual much mention these Cristianitos and apparently is the best card in it to send to hell the quotes theory of evolution is one that resa so. "If humans evolved from apes, then why do the other monkeys did not evolve with us?" Note its nescedad to the use of the word monkey. While this reasoning seems logical, in fact a product of his own disinformation, because guess what? There are primitive species of fish and even 100% aquatic animals that barely have changed in the billions of years since its inception, take for example, a well-known living fossil, the coelacanth , the coelacanth was believed extinct millions of years ago, and just a few decades ago live specimens were caught near South Africa and the people close to the waters where I fish the animal they said that I got to know a long time ago. And to go that far, other species of primitive fish are here, in my beautiful and insecure Mexico, pejelagarto famous that, as seen in photos, share characteristics with the coelacanth, scales very large and apparently heavy with the fins lovuladas, have similar characteristics avitan many fish in the Amazon and African lungfish, evidence of passing fish-amphibian. Check out the data. Also, my mention of evolution clasesulla titis and lemurs, they are very similar to these early primates Havito land and no major changes are more than the diversity of its espcies. And so many apparently primitive animal species remain unchanged to this day, as or horseshoe crab casserole, relatives of spiders and scorpions, belonging to the order of arachnids, another example of a relative who did not evolve, or look at these examples of other related animals evolved that did not evolve, as the Japanese primitive shark found in 2004, telling me of jellyfish, no changes Mallor these life forms were the first to appear. All due to the adaptation and environmental changes hambientes, apes are strong, agile, gregarious, their senses are far superior to ours and are covered with a good protective layer of hair, but the evolution almost took a human failure , hairless, weak, with limited senses but with a characteristic very particular, a brain more complex and developed than the others and the nature and evolicion he could take advantage, the other apes have characteristics that surpass that of humans, therefore nescesitan not as large and complex brains, it is a form of balance, nescesitan not evolve much needed form in which the iso a human instinct to remember survival instinct is as if the maximum pulieramos isiera that our seemingly unique feature positive (natural selection and adaptation). Perhaps also some Cristianitos safar want it with that of then why the fuck are so many people with different skin colors, for that matter, this is a consequence of natural selection itself, basic example, people from black or brown skin in africa and people with fair skin and very white deplano in Europe, ok, go, was discovered that the skin of people of color is better to reflect UV rays and other so this type of sunlight does not affect your body, on the other hand, devido to cold temperatures in Europe and temperate climates, humans nescesitaban that picmentacion, so their skins over thousands of years turned white, that's why when exposed to direct sunlight, people of white complexion, burn. It's simple adaptation and natural selection and also remember that this process takes thousands of years. Different species of animals and plants and their adaptations they developed to make life as something viable are evidence of Darwin's theories, now that that referred to the word theory, many Cristianitos take the word theory as mere speculation based on evidence created in their minds apparently creationists and circumstantial, not saves it sircunstancial? Yes? Well let us, for they Pienza at first take the word theory is as disposable as a diaper Calabaceado. Which is a lie, consider the concept of theory in the Geek conosimiento source xD.
approach a hypothetical-deductive system is a scientific explanation or description of a related set of observations or experiments. Thus, a scientific theory is based on hypotheses or assumptions verified by groups of scientists (sometimes an assumption, not directly verifiable but most of its consequences). It covers various scientific laws in general and sometimes deductible verified the theory itself. These laws become part of the assumptions and key assumptions of the theory to encompass the knowledge accepted by the scientific community in the field of research and is accepted by most specialists.
In science, theory also called a model for understanding a set of empirical facts. In physics, the term usually means an infrastructure theory mathematics derived from a small set of basic principles can of producing experimental predictions for a given category of physical systems. An example would be "electromagnetic theory", which is usually taken as synonymous with classical electromagnetism, specific results can be derived from Maxwell equations.
Well, if we reason that a bit, we can deduce a certain way ... not you, I think guys are too still, that a theory is not only based on assumptions, but it also relies on experiments, math practice and rehearse and analyzed by a scientific community until it is back a law .. . but why it is still theory? Well, all savemos of the powerful influence of the Iglesias, mainly The Catholic, on many hambitos sociopolitical structure. Get out your deductions because I do not want to get involved in censorship farts xD. By the way that brain began to move higher kindly gave evolution. A theory is not falsifiable just like that, it is as solid as a law until proven otherwise. For these reasons, the theory of creationism as a theory is not viable, because no other documents besides the Bible to sustain or really strong evidence that such a thing existed, on the other hand, the Christians say that faith can move mountains and such relcionadas things divine with its strong belief, does the act of seeking evidence; not a sign of weakness in your faith? In seeking evidence; indirectly creationism show a certain lack of strength of faith, as I said once. "The lack of evidence of the existence of something is the evidence of absence." If you do not understand me, I challenge Christians to look for evidence of the existence of the Mexican jumping beans carnivores Japanese pirate outer space with mariachi hat. Cren even if you come from Adam and Eve is more logical and reasonable to be a product of natural development over thousands of years of evolution and natural selection, that there I'll hold on to something very consistent call to the topic, perhaps many atheists and I arrived at the deduction worth a shit. The theory of The Great incest, as well as hear, the plain and simple fact and go and jump to the neighbor is committing incest, your audience, you are the product of incest, and your parents and your grandparents and so the whole world, ha, more surprised when you read in this magazine that most likely are descendants of gene gis Khan? You see, in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth, so much that of awevos. And created the earth, and stuck there for a man named Adam and a partner went gore act eva, well they had children, and those sons of Adam and Eve had kids ... and as they had children? Most likely he threw the breast or sisters he mentions the Bible, and so had children, the children of Cain and Abel, were bone-cousin, and so on are larger iso to the amount of 2000 million people acutalmente human there, and if you're not convinced of that, remember Noah's Ark, they started very similar. So you do if cres in the stories of the Bible, prepare to be part of the great incest and if you're not part of the religion, put to soak the brush with no guilt or shame. See you to the next blog.
